Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 810-820Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa404
Keywords
colorectal cancer; gene-environment interactions; polygenic risk scores; healthy lifestyle factors; epidemiology
Categories
Funding
- Anne Potter Wilson chair endowment at Vanderbilt University [R01 CA188214]
- US National Cancer Institute [40685]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found a correlation between healthier lifestyles and reduced risk of colorectal cancer, with a more significant risk reduction observed among individuals with high genetic susceptibility. Although no multiplicative interactions were identified, a significant additive interaction was found between lifestyle scores and genetic risk scores.
Background: Both genetic and lifestyle factors play an etiologic role in colorectal cancer (CRC). Objectives: We evaluated potential gene-environment interactions in CRC risk. Methods: We used data from 346,297 participants in the UK Biobank cohort. Healthy lifestyle scores (HLSs) were constructed using 8 lifestyle factors, primarily according to the American Cancer Society guidelines, and were categorized into unhealthy, intermediate, and healthy groups. A polygenic risk score (PRS) was created using 95 genetic risk variants identified by genome-wide association studies of CRC and was categorized by tertile. Cox models were used to estimate the HRs and 95% CIs of CRC risk associated with the HLS and PRS. Results: During a median follow-up of 5.8 y, 2066 incident cases of CRC were identified. Healthier HLSs were associated with reduced risk of CRC in a dose-response manner. The risk reduction was more apparent among those with high PRS (HRhealthy vs. unhealthy (HLS1): 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.79 for men and 0.71; 0.58, 0.85 for men and women combined) than those with low PRS. Although no multiplicative interactions were identified, the HLS1 and PRS showed a significant additive interaction (P = 0.02 for all participants combined, 0.04 for men). In analyses including all participants, the adjusted CRC cumulative risk from age 40 to 75 y was 6.40% for those with high PRS/unhealthy HLS1, with a relative excess risk due to interaction of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.06, 1.10), compared with 2.09% among those with low PRS/healthy HLS1. This pattern was more apparent among those who reported not having received any bowel screening before baseline. Conclusions: Although the observational nature of the study precludes proof of causality, our findings suggest that individuals with a high genetic susceptibility could benefit more substantially than those with a low genetic risk from lifestyle modification in reducing CRC risk.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available