4.6 Article

Combined effects of human pressures on Europe's marine ecosystems

Journal

AMBIO
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 1325-1336

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01482-x

Keywords

Anthropogenic pressures; Cumulative effect assessments; Europe' s seas; Human activities; Marine assessment; Marine management

Funding

  1. Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)
  2. European Environment Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that 96% of the European marine area is affected by combined effects from multiple human pressures, with 86% of the coastal area and 46% of the shelf area being impacted by physical disturbances. The results suggest that Europe's seas are widely disturbed, highlighting a potential discrepancy between ambitions for Blue Growth and the objective of achieving good environmental status within the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
Marine ecosystems are under high demand for human use, giving concerns about how pressures from human activities may affect their structure, function, and status. In Europe, recent developments in mapping of marine habitats and human activities now enable a coherent spatial evaluation of potential combined effects of human activities. Results indicate that combined effects from multiple human pressures are spread to 96% of the European marine area, and more specifically that combined effects from physical disturbance are spread to 86% of the coastal area and 46% of the shelf area. We compare our approach with corresponding assessments at other spatial scales and validate our results with European-scale status assessments for coastal waters. Uncertainties and development points are identified. Still, the results suggest that Europe's seas are widely disturbed, indicating potential discrepancy between ambitions for Blue Growth and the objective of achieving good environmental status within the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available