4.7 Article

Evaluating micro-irrigation system performance through assessment of farmers' satisfaction: implications for adoption, longevity, and water use efficiency

Journal

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
Volume 246, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106655

Keywords

Water scarcity; Drip irrigation; Performance evaluation; Agriculture extension; Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The success of agricultural innovations largely depends on farmers' satisfaction, and this study aimed to investigate farmers' satisfaction with drip irrigation technology in Iran. The European satisfaction model (ESM) was used to analyze the factors influencing farmers' satisfaction, with perceived value, perceived image, and quality playing key roles. The study suggests that improving farmers' satisfaction, perceived image, and quality could lead to increased adoption of drip irrigation among Iranian farmers.
It is generally recognized that the success of agricultural innovations depends to a large extent on farmers' satisfaction with them. While the acceptance of drip irrigation among Iranian farmers is low, this study aims to investigate farmers' satisfaction with drip irrigation technology and related factors. The European satisfaction model (ESM) was used to achieve this aim. A cross-sectional paper-based survey was conducted among farmers (n = 174) in the Behbahan county of southwest Iran. The ESM analysis results showed that perceived hard quality was positive in predicting perceived value. Results also indicated that perceived value, perceived image, and both hard and human quality directly affected farmers' satisfaction. These four variables were able to predict 68% variance in farmers' satisfaction. Moreover, loyalty was firmly positively affected by satisfaction and perceived image. Based on these results, policies were suggested to increase farmers' satisfaction and, consequently, to extend drip irrigation among Iranian farmers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available