4.6 Article

Few-layered WSe2 nanoflowers anchored on graphene nanosheets: a highly efficient and stable electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages 1293-1299

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.104

Keywords

Tungsten selenide; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Electrocatalytic activity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372033, 51202022, 61378028]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZYGX2013Z001]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA034202]
  4. 111 Project [B13042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tungsten selenide (WSe2) has emerged as a promising electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and its HER performance strongly depends on its conductivity and exposed edge sites. Herein, a RGO/WSe2 hybrid network constructed with few-layered WSe2 nanoflowers anchored on graphene nanosheets has been synthesized through a facile one-pot solvothermal method. Compared with bare WSe2 nanoflowers with relatively poor HER performance, the RGO/WSe2 hybrid demonstrates a highly effective and stable electrocatalytic performance: it delivers a small Tafel slope of 57.6 mV dec(-1), a remarkably low onset potential of similar to 150 mV, a high current density of 38.43 mA cm(-2) at 300 mV vs RHE and excellent long-term stability. The superior HER performance of RGO/WSe2 hybrid is attributed to the unique WSe2-anchored-on-graphene structure, which ensures the robust contact between the fewlayered WSe2-nanoflowers catalyst and the highly conductive graphene matrix, leading to enhance the charge transfer kinetics between the catalytic edge sites and the graphene nanosheets. Therefore, the RGO/WSe2 hybrid is promising as high-performance catalysts for hydrogen evolution applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available