4.8 Article

An Electron Acceptor Analogue for Lowering Trap Density in Organic Solar Cells

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 33, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202008134

Keywords

electron acceptor analogues; fused rings; nonfullerene; organic solar cells; trap density

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. UGC/RGC fund [JLFS/P-102/18]
  3. NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme [N_CUHK418/17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The introduction of BTPR as a third component in organic solar cells reduces the trap density, leading to significant improvements in PCE and energy loss. This offers new possibilities for achieving higher efficiency solar cells.
Typical organic semiconductor materials exhibit a high trap density of states, ranging from 10(16) to 10(18) cm(-3), which is one of the important factors in limiting the improvement of power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of organic solar cells (OSCs). In order to reduce the trap density within OSCs, a new strategy to design and synthesize an electron acceptor analogue, BTPR, is developed, which is introduced into OSCs as a third component to enhance the molecular packing order of electron acceptor with and without blending a polymer donor. Finally, the as-cast ternary OSC devices employing BTPR show a notable PCE of 17.8%, with a low trap density (10(15) cm(-3)) and a low energy loss (0.217 eV) caused by non-radiative recombination. This PCE is among the highest values for single-junction OSCs. The trap density of OSCs with the BTPR additives, as low as 10(15) cm(-3), is comparable to and even lower than those of several typical high-performance inorganic/hybrid counterparts, like 10(16) cm(-3) for amorphous silicon, 10(16) cm(-3) for metal oxides, and 10(14) to 10(15) cm(-3) for halide perovskite thin film, and makes it promising for OSCs to obtain a PCE of up to 20%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available