4.5 Article

The impact of emotional face stimuli on working memory performance among men and women with alcohol use disorder

Journal

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106731

Keywords

Alcohol use disorder; Cognition; Emotion processing; Working memory; Social cognition

Funding

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health [R01 AA022456, K01 AA026893]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that individuals with AUD showed differences in working memory performance when attending to and ignoring facial stimuli, with poorer performance observed when ignoring faces. Compared to the control group, the AUD group exhibited decreased performance when ignoring facial stimuli, conditioned on the inability to ignore irrelevant emotional face stimuli, while performance was equivalent between groups when faces were attended.
Background: Individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) often display compromise in emotional processing and non-affective neurocognitive functions. However, relatively little empirical work explores their intersection. In this study, we examined working memory performance when attending to and ignoring facial stimuli among adults with and without AUD. We anticipated poorer performance in the AUD group, particularly when task demands involved ignoring facial stimuli. Whether this relationship was moderated by facial emotion or participant sex were explored as empirical questions. Methods: Fifty-six controls (30 women) and 56 treatment-seekers with AUD (14 women) completed task conditions in which performance was advantaged by either attending to or ignoring facial stimuli, including happy, neutral, or fearful faces. Group, sex, and their interaction were independent factors in all models. Efficiency (accuracy/response time) was the primary outcome of interest. Results: An interaction between group and condition (F-1,F-107 = 6.03, p < .02) was detected. Individual comparisons suggested this interaction was driven by AUD-associated performance deficits when ignoring faces, whereas performance was equivalent between groups when faces were attended. Secondary analyses suggested little influence of specific facial emotions on these effects. Conclusions: These data provide partial support for initial hypotheses, with the AUD group demonstrating poorer working memory performance conditioned on the inability to ignore irrelevant emotional face stimuli. The absence of group differences when scenes were to be ignored (faces remembered) suggests the AUD-associated inability to ignore irrelevance is influenced by specific stimulus qualities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available