4.8 Article

Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Using High-Purity Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Based Field-Effect Transistors

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 10321-10327

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c22589

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; rapid antigen testing; field-effect transistor; semiconducting carbon nanotube; biosensor

Funding

  1. Pitt Innovation Challenge (PInCh), through the Clinical and Translational Science Institute at the University of Pittsburgh
  2. Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) grant from the Office of Naval Research, ONR [N000141410765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the use of a high-purity semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotube field-effect transistor for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigens, displaying high sensitivity and specificity.
Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is critical for facilitating proper containment procedures, and a rapid, sensitive antigen assay is a critical step in curbing the pandemic. In this work, we report the use of a high-purity semiconducting (sc) single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT)-based field-effect transistor (FET) decorated with specific binding chemistry to assess the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antigens in clinical nasopharyngeal samples. Our SWCNT FET sensors, with functionalization of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody (SAb) and anti-nucleocapsid protein antibody, detected the S antigen (SAg) and N antigen (NAg), reaching a limit of detection of 0.55 fg/mL for SAg and 0.016 fg/mL for NAg in calibration samples. SAb-functionalized FET sensors also exhibited good sensing performance in discriminating positive and negative clinical samples, indicating a proof of principle for use as a rapid COVID-19 antigen diagnostic tool with high analytical sensitivity and specificity at low cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available