4.8 Article

Quest for an Efficient 2-in-1 MOF-Based Catalytic System for Cycloaddition of CO2 to Epoxides under Mild Conditions

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 8344-8352

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c20437

Keywords

metal-organic framework; postsynthetic functionalization; carbon dioxide fixation; cycloaddition; heterogeneous catalysis

Funding

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [UMO-2014/14/E/ST5/00652]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A tandem postsynthetic modification strategy was developed for Zr-based metal-organic framework (MOF) materials, resulting in well-defined 2-in-1 heterogeneous catalysts with high catalytic activity in the synthesis of cyclic carbonates. Experimental measurements, including DRIFT and solid-state NMR, helped elucidate the role of each component in the catalytic reaction, especially the cooperative effect between Lewis acid sites and the co-catalyst in the heterogeneous system.
We have devised a straightforward tandem postsynthetic modification strategy for Zr-based metal-organic framework (MOF) materials, which resulted in a series of well-defined 2-in-1 heterogeneous catalysts, cat1-cat8, exhibiting high catalytic activity in the synthesis of cyclic carbonates under solvent-free and co-catalyst-free conditions. The materials feature precisely located co-catalyst moieties decorating the metal nodes throughout the bulk of the MOF and yield cyclic carbonates with up to 99% efficiency at room temperature. We use diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements to elucidate the role of each component in this model catalytic reaction. Establishing a method to precisely control the co-catalyst loading allowed us to observe the cooperativity between Lewis acid sites and the co-catalyst in the 2-in-1 heterogeneous system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available