4.6 Review

Pancreatic Cancer: Recent Progress of Drugs in Clinical Trials

Journal

AAPS JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00556-2

Keywords

angiogenesis inhibitors; anti-metabolite drugs; biological targeted drugs; chemotherapy drugs; kinase inhibitors

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81690263, 81973249]
  2. Shanghai Commission of science and technology [20S11905500]
  3. Foundation Program of Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery of the Ministry of Education
  4. Shanghai Education Commission Major Project [2017-01-07-00-07-E00052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor that is difficult to diagnose early, with most patients diagnosed in advanced stages. Current main treatments include chemotherapy, which has not significantly improved patient prognosis.
Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor and one of the primary causes of cancer-related death. Because pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose in the early course of the disease, most patients present with advanced lesions at the time of diagnosis, and only 20% of patients are eligible for surgery. Consequently, drug treatment has become extremely important. At present, the main treatment regimens for pancreatic cancer are gemcitabine and the FORFIRINOX and MPACT regimens. However, none of these regimens substantially improves the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. Extensive efforts have been dedicated to the study of pancreatic cancer in recent years. With the development and clinical application of biological targeted drugs, the biological targeted treatment of tumors has been widely accepted. Therefore, this article used relevant clinical trial data to summarize the research progress of traditional chemotherapy drugs and biological targeted drugs for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available