4.5 Article

Beliefs, fear and awareness of women about breast cancer: Effects on mammography screening practices

Journal

NURSING OPEN
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 890-899

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.696

Keywords

beliefs; breast cancer; fatalism; Iran; mammography screening practice; Muslim

Categories

Funding

  1. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran [TBZMED.REC.1396.250]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that self-efficacy, susceptibility, motivation, and perceived barriers were associated with mammography screening practices among women in Iran, while fatalistic belief and awareness towards breast cancer did not have a significant impact.
Aim: This study sought to investigate the beliefs, fear and awareness about breast cancer and mammography screening practices of women in Iran. Methods: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted at Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province, northwest of Iran from February-July 2017. One hundred and fifty-two women aged 40 years and older, who were referred to 12 health centres for health services were selected via clustering sampling. Associations between variables and mammography screening practices were examined using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Participants who had a mammogram within the last 24 months were compared with those who had none. Sociodemographic questionnaire, Champion's Breast Cancer Fear Scale, Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening, Breast Cancer Awareness Scale and Powe Fatalism Inventory were the tools used for data gathering. Results: Just 38.2% of women reported having a mammogram within the last 24 months. Self-efficacy (OR = 5.36, B = 1.68, p < .001), susceptibility (OR = 2.83, B = 1.04, p < .001), motivation (OR = 2.11, B = 0.75, p = .024) and lower perceived barriers (OR = 0.25, B = -1.37, p < .001) were associated with being screened. Neither fatalistic belief nor awareness towards breast cancer was significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available