4.5 Article

Adventitious rooting of cuttings from the therapeutic honey plants, Leptospermum polygalifolium and L. scoparium

Journal

RHIZOSPHERE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100306

Keywords

Adventitious rooting; Auxin; Leptospermum polygalifolium; Leptospermum scoparium; Manuka honey; Propagation

Funding

  1. USC Postgraduate Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high demand for therapeutic honey has led to the establishment of Leptospermum nectar plantations. Research has found that L. polygalifolium and L. scoparium are highly amenable to propagation as rooted cuttings, with or without the use of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). Although IBA can increase the number of roots, it does not significantly affect the average rooting percentages of the two species.
High demand for therapeutic honey is driving establishment of Leptospermum (Myrtaceae) nectar plantations. Leptospermum seeds are often difficult to extract or germinate, and so methods have been sought to propagate Leptospermum from cuttings. We assessed the amenability of two high-value species, L. polygalifolium and L. scoparium, to propagation as rooted cuttings with or without the application of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). IBA did not significantly affect average rooting percentages, although IBA occasionally increased the number of adventitious roots per rooted cutting in both species. Average rooting percentages for untreated cuttings were 92%, 88% and 93% for L. polygalifolium clones P6, P9 and P10 and 65% and 76% for L. scoparium clones S9 and S15. The cumulative capacity for plant production from three successive harvests was 95, 126 and 118 rooted cuttings per stock plant for the L. polygalifolium clones and 37 and 53 rooted cuttings per stock plant for the L. scoparium clones. L. polygalifolium and L. scoparium were found to be highly amenable to vegetative propagation, facilitating the establishment of therapeutic-honey plantations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available