4.6 Article

Preparation-microstructure-performance relationship of Li-rich transition metal oxides microspheres as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages 491-499

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.089

Keywords

Lithium ion batteries; cathode materials; carbonate co-precipitation; inner structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21301013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the preparation and characterization of Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 (=0.5Li(2)MnO(3)center dot 0.5LiNi(0.5)Mn(0.5)O(2)) microspheres as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. These microspheres were synthesized by carbonate co-precipitation and calcination with lithium salt. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer, and nitrogen adsorption. It is found that the synthesized samples, of spherical morphology with primary nanoparticles assembled in secondary microparticles, have a diameter of similar to 5 mu m. When used as the cathode materials for lithium ion batteries, the sample prepared at aging time of 9 h with ammonia concentration of 0.6 mol L-1 shows excellent electrochemical performance. Their charge capacities are 274 mAh g(-1) at the current density of 20 mA g(-1), much higher than those of the commercial LiCoO2 and LiFePO4. More importantly, they exhibit excellent rate performances with a capacity of 165 and 144 mAh g(-1) at the current densities of 600 and 1000 mA g(-1), respectively, superior to those of other reported Li-rich cathode materials. This work illustrates the relation among synthesis condition, inner structure and electrochemical performance, which has a positive effect on industry production. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available