4.7 Article

18O and 2H in streamflow across Canada

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100754

Keywords

Stable isotopes; Streamflow; Hydrology; Water sources; Water balance; Evaporation; Transpiration

Funding

  1. Environment and Climate Change Canada
  2. InnoTech Alberta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study region: Water samples for isotopic analysis were collected during 2013-2019 at 331 gauging stations across Canada in representative watersheds ranging from the Atlantic to the Pacific to the Arctic Oceans. Drainage area coverage of the network included 56 % of Canada's landmass (9,984,670 km(2)) and was representative of 91 % of Canada's annual water yield. Study focus: Baseline data, including 4603 O-18 and H-2 analyses, are described to assess potential for process studies and predictive model calibration. New hydrological insights for the region: While similar patterns are noted between isotopes in streamflow and precipitation across Canada, systematic evaporative enrichment in streamflow occurs in lake- and wetland-rich areas, and systematic depletion occurs in some mountainous and/or cold-regions watersheds. The latter are attributed to uncertainty in precipitation isotope records, glacial melt and/or permafrost thaw. In delta O-18-delta H-2 space, streamflow characteristically plotted on or below the Canadian Meteoric Water Line (CMWL) (delta H-2 = 8.6(18)O+8.5) along imbricated Regional River Lines (RRL) displaying a range of regression slopes (4.34-9.31) and intercepts (-54 to +24), reflecting regional variations in isotopic composition of input sources, evaporative enrichment, and tributary mixing. We define the Canadian Rivers Line (CRL) based on the linear regression of flow-weighted mean values of station data (delta H-2 = 7.89.delta O-18+0.45, r(2) = 0.962; n = 161).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available