4.6 Article

A multi-objective hyper-heuristic algorithm based on adaptive epsilon-greedy selection

Journal

COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 765-780

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40747-020-00230-8

Keywords

Hyper-heuristics; Multi-objective optimization; Adaptive epsilon-greedy selection strategy; Cross-domain problems

Funding

  1. Technological Research Projects in Henan Province [192102210107]
  2. National Key RD Project [2020YFB1712401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multi-objective hyper-heuristic algorithm HH_EG proposed in this paper is based on adaptive epsilon-greedy selection and can solve MOPs by selecting and combining low-level heuristics without parameter tuning, making it easy to integrate with various performance indicators. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of HH_EG in combining the advantages of each LLH and solving cross-domain problems.
A variety of meta-heuristics have shown promising performance for solving multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). However, existing meta-heuristics may have the best performance on particular MOPs, but may not perform well on the other MOPs. To improve the cross-domain ability, this paper presents a multi-objective hyper-heuristic algorithm based on adaptive epsilon-greedy selection (HH_EG) for solving MOPs. To select and combine low-level heuristics (LLHs) during the evolutionary procedure, this paper also proposes an adaptive epsilon-greedy selection strategy. The proposed hyper-heuristic can solve problems from varied domains by simply changing LLHs without redesigning the high-level strategy. Meanwhile, HH_EG does not need to tune parameters, and is easy to be integrated with various performance indicators. We test HH_EG on the classical DTLZ test suite, the IMOP test suite, the many-objective MaF test suite, and a test suite of a real-world multi-objective problem. Experimental results show the effectiveness of HH_EG in combining the advantages of each LLH and solving cross-domain problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available