4.7 Article

Urban surfaces analysis with remote sensing data for the evaluation of UHI mitigation scenarios

Journal

URBAN CLIMATE
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100761

Keywords

UHI; Remote sensing; Albedo; Solar reflective materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used satellite images and solar reflective materials to investigate the Urban Heat Island, showing that multiple UHI mitigation scenarios are feasible with relatively fast return on investment. Furthermore, scenarios involving modification of multiple surfaces simultaneously have shown greater potential from a public administration perspective.
Considering the new IPCC report and its recent suggestions, it is important to pay serious attention to the Urban Heat Island issue. In this study, satellite images acquired by the Worldview3 sensor (WV3) were processed to classify the different kinds of urban surface and to compute the albedo value for each surface. Then several UHI mitigation scenarios were analyzed, varying selectively the surface albedo by choosing solar reflective materials. Clay tile pitched roofs, dark roofs and parking areas were considered as modifiable surfaces and their albedo values were increased on the basis of the literature and of data made available by product manufacturers. For each proposed scenario, the reduction of intensity of the Urban Heat Island effect (ATD), the energy saving brought by lower absorption of air conditioning systems (Delta E) and the consequent cost savings were calculated. All the scenarios proved to be convenient and with a relatively fast return on investment. In particular, two scenarios involving the modification of several surfaces at the same time proved to be the most promising ones from the perspective of a public administration, with significant benefits on the well-being of the population, as well as with similar and relatively short payback periods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available