4.5 Article

The cut-off value of transient elastography to the value of hepatic venous pressure gradient in alcoholic cirrhosis

Journal

CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 197-206

Publisher

KOREAN ASSOC STUDY LIVER
DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0171

Keywords

Liver cirrhosis; Hypertension, Portal; Elastography

Funding

  1. Soonchunhyang University Research Fund
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [2020R1F1A1072449, 2020R1F1A1076282]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1F1A1072449, 2020R1F1A1076282] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the correlation between liver stiffness value, LS to platelet ratio, LS-spleen diameter-to-platelet ratio score and HVPG in alcoholic cirrhosis patients compared to viral cirrhosis. The results showed that liver stiffness value was higher in alcoholic cirrhosis patients than viral cirrhosis patients.
Background/Aims: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reflects portal hypertension, but its measurement is invasive. Transient elastography (TE) is a noninvasive method for evaluating liver stiffness (LS). We investigated the correlation between the value of LS, LS to platelet ratio (LPR), LS-spleen diameter-to-platelet ratio score (LSPS) and HVPG according to the etiology of cirrhosis, especially focused on alcoholic cirrhosis. Methods: Between January 2008 and March 2017, 556 patients who underwent HVPG and TE were consecutively enrolled. We evaluated LS, LPR, and LSPS according to the etiology of cirrhosis and analyzed their correlations with HVPG. Results: The LS value was higher in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis than viral cirrhosis based on the HVPG (43.5 vs. 32.0 kPa, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in the LPR or LSPS between alcoholic and viral cirrhosis groups, and the areas under the curves for the LPR and LSPS in subgroups according to HVPG levels were not superior to that for LS. In alcoholic cirrhosis, the LS cutoff value for predicting an HVPG >= 10 mmHg was 32.2 kPa with positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.5% and 36.6 kPa for HVPG >= 12 mmHg with PPV of 91.0%. Conclusions: The LS cutoff value should be determined separately for patients with alcoholic and viral cirrhosis. In alcoholic cirrhosis, the LS cutoff values were 32.2 and 36.6 kPa for predicting an HVPG >= 10 and >= 12 mmHg, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the LPR or LSPS between alcoholic and viral cirrhosis groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available