4.7 Article

A systematic approach to context-mapping to prepare for health interventions: development and validation of the SETTING-tool in four countries

Journal

BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003221

Keywords

diagnostics and tools; health policies and all other topics; public health; asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Funding

  1. EU Research and Innovation program Horizon 2020 (Health, Medical research and the challenge of ageing) [680997]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [680997] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper details the development and validation of a systematic context-mapping tool for health interventions, created through collaboration with local stakeholders. The tool, named SETTING-tool, has been proven to be highly feasible, acceptable, and effective in diverse low-resource settings, providing evidence-based guidance for context-driven implementation strategies.
Effectiveness of health interventions can be substantially impaired by implementation failure. Context-driven implementation strategies are critical for successful implementation. However, there is no practical, evidence-based guidance on how to map the context in order to design context-driven strategies. Therefore, this practice paper describes the development and validation of a systematic context-mapping tool. The tool was cocreated with local end-users through a multistage approach. As proof of concept, the tool was used to map beliefs and behaviour related to chronic respiratory disease within the FRESH AIR project in Uganda, Kyrgyzstan, Vietnam and Greece. Feasibility and acceptability were evaluated using the modified Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity. Effectiveness was assessed by the degree to which context-driven adjustments were made to implementation strategies of FRESH AIR health interventions. The resulting Setting-Exploration-Treasure-Trail-to-Inform-implementatioN-strateGies (SETTING-tool) consisted of six steps: (1) Coset study priorities with local stakeholders, (2) Combine a qualitative rapid assessment with a quantitative survey (a mixed-method design), (3) Use context-sensitive materials, (4) Collect data involving community researchers, (5) Analyse pragmatically and/or in-depth to ensure timely communication of findings and (6) Continuously disseminate findings to relevant stakeholders. Use of the tool proved highly feasible, acceptable and effective in each setting. To conclude, the SETTING-tool is validated to systematically map local contexts for (lung) health interventions in diverse low-resource settings. It can support policy-makers, non-governmental organisations and health workers in the design of context-driven implementation strategies. This can reduce the risk of implementation failure and the waste of resource potential. Ultimately, this could improve health outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available