4.5 Article

Validation of the Overactive Bladder-Bladder Assessment Tool (OAB-BAT): A Potential Alternative to the Standard Bladder Diary for Monitoring OAB Outcomes

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 1176-1183

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.001

Keywords

Overactive bladder; Patient-reported outcome measures; Surveys and questionnaires; Validation; Urinary tract symptoms; Bladder diary

Funding

  1. Astellas, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new comprehensive overactive bladder (OAB) patient-reported outcome measure, OAB-BAT, was developed and psychometrically evaluated in a study of 170 OAB patients, showing validity and reliability in assessing OAB symptoms, bother, and impacts.
Background: An advisory board concluded that a new, comprehensive overactive bladder (OAB) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure should be developed in accordance with regulatory guidelines. The OAB-Bladder Assessment Tool (OAB-BAT) was developed with qualitative input from OAB patients and experts to measure symptoms, bother, impacts, and satisfaction with treatment. Objective: Psychometric evaluation of the OAB-BAT assessing PRO OAB symptoms, bother, and impacts during a 7-d recall period. Design, setting, and participants: Psychometric testing was conducted for a 28-d observational study of 170 OAB patients. Eligibility criteria included clinician-confirmed OAB diagnosis with at least eight micturitions per day. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Assessments included the OAB-BAT, a 7-d bladder diary, and co-validating OAB PROs. Analysis included classical and modern test theories. A scoring algorithm was developed and psychometric properties were assessed. Results and limitations: The majority of participants were women (72.4%) with moderate OAB symptom severity (53.5%). More than one-third of participants (34.1%) were incontinent. Responses were well balanced across bother and impact items, while symptom frequency items showed sparse responses. Analysis supported an eight-item unidimensional model based on bother and impacts. No items performed differently by gender or continence status. The OAB-BAT showed internal consistency (omega = 0.918), retest reliability (two-way random intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81), and convergent validity with the OAB-q (r > 0.4). Known groups showed the expected trend. Comparisons between OAB-BAT scores and components of the bladder diary showed a moderate effect size (r > 0.4). Conclusions: The eight-item OAB-BAT with 7-d recall is valid and reliable as an OAB PRO measure. Structural modeling, balanced with content validity considerations, produced robust scores. The OAB-BAT is a useful addition to the clinical assessment of patients, designed to complement the use of bladder diaries for monitoring OAB outcomes, in clinical trial and clinical practice environments. Future studies will need to assess the treatment satisfaction items in a larger sample of patients receiving OAB treatment. Patient summary: We tested a questionnaire designed to assess overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, bother, satisfaction, and impacts by asking patients to complete it on a weekly basis. We found that the questionnaire accurately captures the symptoms and impacts that are most important to patients with OAB. We conclude that the questionnaire could be a useful instrument and, after further assessment in clinical practice and research, a possible alternative to a bladder diary in measuring OAB outcomes. (C) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available