4.8 Article

How to identify win-win interventions that benefit human health and conservation

Journal

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 298-304

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00640-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science for Nature and People Partnership (SNAPP)
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowships [DGE-114747, 1656518]
  3. Bing Fellowship in Honor of Paul Ehrlich
  4. Stanford Data Science Scholars program
  5. Queensland Government Accelerate Postdoctoral Research Fellowship
  6. ARC DECRA fellowship [DE190100710]
  7. National Science Foundation [OCE-1829509, CNH1414102]
  8. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Sloan Research Fellowship
  9. University of Washington Innovation Award
  10. James and Nancy Kelso Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship
  11. NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology [1611767]
  12. National Institutes of Health [R01TW010286]
  13. GDP SEED grant from the Freeman Spogli Institute at Stanford University
  14. NSF DEB [2011179]
  15. Ecosystem Mission Area of the US Geological Survey
  16. Division Of Environmental Biology
  17. Direct For Biological Sciences [2011179] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  18. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  19. Direct For Biological Sciences [1611767] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This Perspective emphasizes the importance of recognizing trade-offs and synergies among targets in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. By distinguishing win-wins from other outcomes and utilizing a framework for assessing relationships among targets, interdisciplinary problem-solvers can effectively compare multi-target interventions related to human health and conservation.
Reaching the Sustainable Development Goals requires recognizing trade-offs and synergies among targets. Focusing on conservation and human health, this Perspective suggests how to productively distinguish win-wins from other outcomes. To reach the Sustainable Development Goals, we may need to act on synergies between some targets while mediating trade-offs between other targets. But what, exactly, are synergies and trade-offs, and how are they related to other outcomes, such as 'win-win' solutions? Finding limited guidance in the existing literature, we developed an operational method for distinguishing win-wins from eight other possible dual outcomes (lose-lose, lose-neutral and so on). Using examples related to human health and conservation, we illustrate how interdisciplinary problem-solvers can use this framework to assess relationships among targets and compare multi-target interventions that affect people and nature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available