Journal
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 298-304Publisher
NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00640-z
Keywords
-
Funding
- Science for Nature and People Partnership (SNAPP)
- NSF Graduate Research Fellowships [DGE-114747, 1656518]
- Bing Fellowship in Honor of Paul Ehrlich
- Stanford Data Science Scholars program
- Queensland Government Accelerate Postdoctoral Research Fellowship
- ARC DECRA fellowship [DE190100710]
- National Science Foundation [OCE-1829509, CNH1414102]
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Sloan Research Fellowship
- University of Washington Innovation Award
- James and Nancy Kelso Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship
- NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology [1611767]
- National Institutes of Health [R01TW010286]
- GDP SEED grant from the Freeman Spogli Institute at Stanford University
- NSF DEB [2011179]
- Ecosystem Mission Area of the US Geological Survey
- Division Of Environmental Biology
- Direct For Biological Sciences [2011179] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Div Of Biological Infrastructure
- Direct For Biological Sciences [1611767] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This Perspective emphasizes the importance of recognizing trade-offs and synergies among targets in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. By distinguishing win-wins from other outcomes and utilizing a framework for assessing relationships among targets, interdisciplinary problem-solvers can effectively compare multi-target interventions related to human health and conservation.
Reaching the Sustainable Development Goals requires recognizing trade-offs and synergies among targets. Focusing on conservation and human health, this Perspective suggests how to productively distinguish win-wins from other outcomes. To reach the Sustainable Development Goals, we may need to act on synergies between some targets while mediating trade-offs between other targets. But what, exactly, are synergies and trade-offs, and how are they related to other outcomes, such as 'win-win' solutions? Finding limited guidance in the existing literature, we developed an operational method for distinguishing win-wins from eight other possible dual outcomes (lose-lose, lose-neutral and so on). Using examples related to human health and conservation, we illustrate how interdisciplinary problem-solvers can use this framework to assess relationships among targets and compare multi-target interventions that affect people and nature.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available