4.8 Article

Proactive conservation to prevent habitat losses to agricultural expansion

Journal

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 314-322

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust, Our Planet Our Health (Livestock, Environment and People, LEAP) [205212/Z/16/Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The projected loss of natural ecosystems for agricultural expansion will greatly threaten biodiversity, with almost 90% of terrestrial vertebrate species losing habitat. Proactive food policies could help reduce these threats and promote healthier human diets.
The projected loss of millions of square kilometres of natural ecosystems to meet future demand for food, animal feed, fibre and bioenergy crops is likely to massively escalate threats to biodiversity. Reducing these threats requires a detailed knowledge of how and where they are likely to be most severe. We developed a geographically explicit model of future agricultural land clearance based on observed historical changes, and combined the outputs with species-specific habitat preferences for 19,859 species of terrestrial vertebrates. We project that 87.7% of these species will lose habitat to agricultural expansion by 2050, with 1,280 species projected to lose >= 25% of their habitat. Proactive policies targeting how, where, and what food is produced could reduce these threats, with a combination of approaches potentially preventing almost all these losses while contributing to healthier human diets. As international biodiversity targets are set to be updated in 2021, these results highlight the importance of proactive efforts to safeguard biodiversity by reducing demand for agricultural land. Agricultural expansion to grow food, fibre and biofuel will further threaten biodiversity. This study finds that almost 90% of terrestrial vertebrate species will lose habitat to such expansion, but proactive food policies could reduce these threats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available