4.7 Article

Hospital Preparedness, Resilience, and Psychological Burden Among Clinical Nurses in Addressing the COVID-19 Crisis in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.573932

Keywords

clinical nurses; COVID-19 crisis; hospital preparedness; nurses' resilience; psychological burden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the hospital preparedness, psychological burden, and resilience of 281 clinical nurses in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in response to COVID-19. The results showed high levels of self-assessed hospital preparedness and nurses' resilience, with most nurses experiencing normal levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. The findings highlight the importance of meeting the needs of clinical nurses during disease outbreaks through improvements in education, support, and mental health programs.
In the continuous effort to minimize the devastating effects of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and to curb the spread of the disease, hospital preparedness and resilience play significant roles in the psychological well-being of clinical nurses given that their work demands immediate action to adapt and adjust to stressors. Thus, this study investigates the hospital preparedness, psychological burden, and resilience of clinical nurses in addressing COVID-19 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 281 clinical nurses participated in the survey from April 2020 to June 2020. Results show that clinical nurses perceived a high self-assessed COVID-19 hospital preparedness (49.65, SD = 2.30); high self-assessed nurses' resilience (4.03, SD = 0.36); and most have normal levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. The variables were predicted to be statistically significant (F-18,F-262 = 4.14, p = 0.001) and accounted for 16.8% of the variance in the nurses' perception of hospital preparedness (R-2 = 0.221; adjusted R-2 = 0.168). The regression analysis was statistically significant (F-30,F-250 = 6.71, p = 0.001) and accounted for 38% of the variance in nurses' resilience (R-2 = 0.446, Adjusted R-2 = 0.380). The predictors of depression, anxiety, and stress show that the overall relationship was statistically significant at (F-23,F-257 = 6.71, p < 0.001), (F-23,F-257 = 6.675, p 0.000), and (F-23,F-257 = 6.692, p 0.000) with 31.9% of the variance (R-2 = 0.375, Adjusted R-2 = 0.319), 31.8% of the variance (R-2 = 0.374, Adjusted R-2 = 0.318), and 31.9 % of the variance (R-2 = 0.375, Adjusted R-2 = 0.319), respectively. The findings of this study helps in improving the continuing education program, psychological support, and mental health program to ensure that the needs of clinical nurses are addressed during the outbreak of a disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available