4.6 Article

Synthesis and Swelling Behavior of Highly Porous Epoxy Polymers

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 5, Issue 48, Pages 31011-31018

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04035

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-12-2-0022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many advantageous properties of cross-linked polymers relate to their network structures. In this study, network structures of three DGEBA-based epoxy systems at various DGEBA monomer sizes were investigated via equilibrium swelling and glass transition behavior. Each system was cured with a tetra-functional diamine, 4,4'-methylenebiscyclohexanamine, in the presence of a nonreactive solvent, i.e., THF at a solvent-to-monomer volume fraction ranging from 0 to 92%. Experimental results revealed that the conventional swelling model (the Dusek model) accurately calculates M-c values of the cured gels prepared in moderate dilute environments, up to approximately 60% by volume of THF. For gels cured in extreme dilute environments, i.e., in the presence of above 60% by volume of THF, the calculated M-c values using the Dusek model were found to increase sharply as a function of the initial solvent content. The observed dramatic increase in M-c values was not supported by the dry T-g of the identical polymer systems. In fact, the dry T-g values of the polymer systems were found to be relatively insensitive to the initial solvent content. A modification was proposed to the Dusek model that incorporates an additional term, which accounts for the probability of finding elastic chains in a polymer network. Using the modified equation, A values were varied as expected with the molecular weight of DGEBA and insensitive to the amount of the solvent initially used during cure. Furthermore, the modified M-c values were shown to be consistent with the dry T-g values in view of the Fox and Loshaek model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available