Journal
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.579193
Keywords
survey; methodology; metadata; entomology; insect decline
Categories
Funding
- US National Science Foundation [EF 1703048, 2033263]
- UCLA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
- University of Florida Biodiversity Institute Fellowship
- Direct For Biological Sciences [2033263] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Division Of Environmental Biology [2033263] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Benchmark studies of insect populations are increasingly important in the Anthropocene due to accelerating concern about insect trends. Lack of standardization in insect monitoring methods calls for coordinated focus on standards and best practices. Simple guidelines and seven primary insect sampling methods are provided to address this issue.
Benchmark studies of insect populations are increasingly relevant and needed amid accelerating concern about insect trends in the Anthropocene. The growing recognition that insect populations may be in decline has given rise to a renewed call for insect population monitoring by scientists, and a desire from the broader public to participate in insect surveys. However, due to the immense diversity of insects and a vast assortment of data collection methods, there is a general lack of standardization in insect monitoring methods, such that a sudden and unplanned expansion of data collection may fail to meet its ecological potential or conservation needs without a coordinated focus on standards and best practices. To begin to address this problem, we provide simple guidelines for maximizing return on proven inventory methods that will provide insect benchmarking data suitable for a variety of ecological responses, including occurrence and distribution, phenology, abundance and biomass, and diversity and species composition. To track these responses, we present seven primary insect sampling methods-malaise trapping, light trapping, pan trapping, pitfall trappings, beating sheets, acoustic monitoring, and active visual surveys-and recommend standards while highlighting examples of model programs. For each method, we discuss key topics such as recommended spatial and temporal scales of sampling, important metadata to track, and degree of replication needed to produce rigorous estimates of ecological responses. We additionally suggest protocols for scalable insect monitoring, from backyards to national parks. Overall, we aim to compile a resource that can be used by diverse individuals and organizations seeking to initiate or improve insect monitoring programs in this era of rapid change.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available