4.5 Article

Influence of Increasing Task Complexity and Use of Informational Assistance Systems on Mental Workload

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010102

Keywords

mental workload; human– machine interaction; manual assembly; task complexity; ECG; eye-tracking

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany [FKZ 02L15A261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence of task complexity and assistance systems on cognitive workload and finds that task complexity impacts cognitive workload, with differences in usability among different assistance systems becoming evident. Additional research on validity and alignment is recommended for further ergonomic considerations and recommendations.
(1) Background: Cognitive aspects and complexity in modern manual mixed model assembly are increasing. To reduce mental workload (MWL), informational assistance systems are introduced. The influence of complexity and used assistance system on MWL should be investigated to further improve the implementation of such assistance systems. (2) Methods: Using a simulated close to real-life assembly task a 2 x 3 design was chosen, with two levels of assembly complexity (within subjects) and three different assistance systems (paper, Augmented Reality (AR)-glasses, tablet-between subjects). MWL was measured using either physiological response (electrocardiogram (ECG) and eye-tracking) or performance indicators. (3) Results: An influence of task complexity on MWL can be shown. Additionally, usability based differences between the used assistance systems become more evident with reference to the results of area of interest analysis. (4) Conclusions: Using a multi-modal measurement approach, it is possible to detect complexity-based differences in MWL. Additional research on validity and alignment is needed to further use these for (neuro-) ergonomic considerations and recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available