4.7 Review

Understanding the Determination of Meat Quality Using Biochemical Characteristics of the Muscle: Stress at Slaughter and Other Missing Keys

Journal

FOODS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10010084

Keywords

slaughter; stress; meat quality; behavior; physiology; postmortem muscle metabolism; biochemistry; proteomics; modeling

Funding

  1. Marie Skodowska-Curie grant [713654]
  2. [MF20180029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lack of robust models for predicting meat quality traits using muscle biochemical characteristics may be due to neglect of various aspects of the model paradigm, including the impact of preslaughter stress on meat quality, the fact that phenotypic similarity does not imply similarity in biological causes, and the complexity of biological systems, which can reach homeostatic equilibrium in countless ways involving thousands of interacting processes and molecules.
Despite increasingly detailed knowledge of the biochemical processes involved in the determination of meat quality traits, robust models, using biochemical characteristics of the muscle to predict future meat quality, lack. The neglecting of various aspects of the model paradigm may explain this. First, preslaughter stress has a major impact on meat quality and varies according to slaughter context and individuals. Yet, it is rarely taken into account in meat quality models. Second, phenotypic similarity does not imply similarity in the underlying biological causes, and several models may be needed to explain a given phenotype. Finally, the implications of the complexity of biological systems are discussed: a homeostatic equilibrium can be reached in countless ways, involving thousands of interacting processes and molecules at different levels of the organism, changing over time and differing between animals. Consequently, even a robust model may explain a significant part, but not all of the variability between individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available