4.6 Article

Anaplasma and Theileria Pathogens in Cattle of Lambwe Valley, Kenya: A Case for Pro-Active Surveillance in the Wildlife-Livestock Interface

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8111830

Keywords

tick-borne pathogens; Anaplasma; Theileria; zebu cattle; wildlife– livestock interface; Kenya

Categories

Funding

  1. DELTAS Africa Initiative grant [DEL-15-011]
  2. African Academy of Sciences (AAS)'s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA)
  3. New Partnership for Africa's Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency)
  4. Wellcome Trust [107742/Z/15/Z]
  5. UK government
  6. German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) ICTDL Project [81235250, 18.7860.2-001.00]
  7. UK's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO)
  8. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
  9. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
  10. government of the Republic of Kenya
  11. government of the Republic of Ethiopia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) are major constraints to livestock production and a threat to public health in Africa. This cross-sectional study investigated the risk of infection with TBPs in cattle of Lambwe Valley, Kenya. Blood samples of 680 zebu cattle from 95 herds in six geospatial clusters within 5 km of Ruma National Park were screened for bacterial and protozoan TBPs by high-resolution melting analysis and sequencing of PCR products. We detected Anaplasma bovis (17.4%), Anaplasma platys (16.9%), Anaplasma marginale (0.6%), Theileria velifera (40%), and Theileria mutans (25.7%), as well as an Anaplasma sp. (11.6%) that matched recently reported Anaplasma sp. sequences from Ethiopia. Babesia, Rickettsia, and Ehrlichia spp. were not detected. The animal and herd-level prevalences for TBPs were 78.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 75.3, 81.5) and 95.8% (95% CI: 91.8, 99.8), respectively. About 31.6% of cattle were co-infected with 13 combinations of TBPs. The prevalence of TBPs differed between clusters and age, but the risk of infection was not associated with sex, herd size, or the distance of homesteads from Ruma. This study adds insight into the epidemiology of TBPs around Ruma and highlights the need for proactive surveillance of TBPs in livestock-wildlife interfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available