4.6 Article

Growth Inhibition by Amino Acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9010007

Keywords

amino acid transport; amino acid toxicity; growth inhibition; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation (ELI)
  2. NWO TOP-GO program [700.10.53]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amino acids are essential for metabolism but can be toxic at high levels intracellularly. Downregulation of amino acid transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a mechanism to avoid toxicity. Overexpression of certain amino acid transporters can induce growth defects, and various amino acids are growth inhibitory to yeast cells when transported into the cell at high levels.
Amino acids are essential metabolites but can also be toxic when present at high levels intracellularly. Substrate-induced downregulation of amino acid transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is thought to be a mechanism to avoid this toxicity. It has been shown that unregulated uptake by the general amino acid permease Gap1 causes cells to become sensitive to amino acids. Here, we show that overexpression of eight other amino acid transporters (Agp1, Bap2, Can1, Dip5, Gnp1, Lyp1, Put4, or Tat2) also induces a growth defect when specific single amino acids are present at concentrations of 0.5-5 mM. We can now state that all proteinogenic amino acids, as well as the important metabolite ornithine, are growth inhibitory to S. cerevisiae when transported into the cell at high enough levels. Measurements of initial transport rates and cytosolic pH show that toxicity is due to amino acid accumulation and not to the influx of co-transported protons. The amino acid sensitivity phenotype is a useful tool that reports on the in vivo activity of transporters and has allowed us to identify new transporter-specific substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available