4.7 Article

Willingness to Receive COVID-19 Vaccination in Japan

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9010048

Keywords

COVID-19; vaccine; willingness; hesitancy; Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that 65.7% of Japanese respondents were willing to be vaccinated, including older age groups, those living in rural areas, and individuals with underlying medical conditions; males showed less hesitancy towards vaccination. Despite the presence of selection bias, the study provides important information for understanding the willingness of Japanese people to be vaccinated.
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines are being developed by many countries for the safety of their population. However, people of various nations have revealed hesitancy towards being vaccinated, citing reasons such as side effects, safety, a lack of trust in vaccine effectiveness, etc. This study aimed to explore the willingness of people in Japan to be vaccinated or not be vaccinated and the reasons for either decision. A sample of 1100 respondents was drawn from an internet research panel, and a questionnaire survey was administered to evaluate their willingness to be vaccinated by gender, age group, place of living, and underlying illness history. After using descriptive statistics and the chi-squared test to evaluate categorical variables, 65.7% of the participants indicated a willingness to be vaccinated; among them were older age groups, those in rural areas, and those with underlying medical conditions. In addition, males showed less hesitancy towards being vaccinated. Although selectivity bias exists, this study is the first to examine the willingness of Japanese people to be vaccinated. Since vaccine hesitancy and refusal ratio were found to be higher in Japan than in other countries, policy efforts are needed to make the country's vaccination program viable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available