Journal
FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.597961
Keywords
urine-based biomarker; Gene Panel; prostate cancer; Gleason score; cancer risk stratification
Categories
Funding
- Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201412014]
- Science and Technology Foundation of Shenzhen [JCYJ20160422145718224, JCYJ20170307095620828]
- Shenzhen Urology Minimally Invasive Engineering Center [GCZX2015043016165448]
- Olympia Diagnostics, Inc.
- Swedish Cancer Foundation
- Swedish Foundation for Higher Education and Cooperation
- Kempe STF
- Umea University
- Medical Faculty Grants Norland fund for Cancer Forskning
- Medical Faculty Grants
Ask authors/readers for more resources
One of the major features of prostate cancer (PCa) is its heterogeneity, which often leads to uncertainty in cancer diagnostics and unnecessary biopsies as well as overtreatment of the disease. Novel non-invasive tests using multiple biomarkers that can identify clinically high-risk cancer patients for immediate treatment and monitor patients with low-risk cancer for active surveillance are urgently needed to improve treatment decision and cancer management. In this study, we identified 14 promising biomarkers associated with PCa and tested the performance of these biomarkers on tissue specimens and pre-biopsy urinary sediments. These biomarkers showed differential gene expression in higher- and lower-risk PCa. The 14-Gene Panel urine test (PMP22, GOLM1, LMTK2, EZH2, GSTP1, PCA3, VEGFA, CST3, PTEN, PIP5K1A, CDK1, TMPRSS2, ANXA3, and CCND1) was assessed in two independent prospective and retrospective urine study cohorts and showed high diagnostic accuracy to identify higher-risk PCa patients with the need for treatment and lower-risk patients for surveillance. The AUC was 0.897 (95% CI 0.939-0.855) in the prospective cohort (n = 202), and AUC was 0.899 (95% CI 0.964-0.834) in the retrospective cohort (n = 97). In contrast, serum PSA and Gleason score had much lower accuracy in the same 202 patient cohorts [AUC was 0.821 (95% CI 0.879-0.763) for PSA and 0.860 (95% CI 0.910-0.810) for Gleason score]. In addition, the 14-Gene Panel was more accurate at risk stratification in a subgroup of patients with Gleason scores 6 and 7 in the prospective cohort (n = 132) with AUC of 0.923 (95% CI 0.968-0.878) than PSA [AUC of 0.773 (95% CI 0.852-0.794)] and Gleason score [AUC of 0.776 (95% CI 0.854-0.698)]. Furthermore, the 14-Gene Panel was found to be able to accurately distinguish PCa from benign prostate with AUC of 0.854 (95% CI 0.892-0.816) in a prospective urine study cohort (n = 393), while PSA had lower accuracy with AUC of 0.652 (95% CI 0.706-0.598). Taken together, the 14-Gene Panel urine test represents a promising non-invasive tool for detection of higher-risk PCa to aid treatment decision and lower-risk PCa for active surveillance.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available