4.0 Article

Old Drugs for New Purpose-Fast Pace Therapeutic Identification for SARS-CoV-2 Infections by Pharmacophore Guided Drug Repositioning Approach

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 212-226

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/bkcs.12171

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; Novel coronavirus; COVID-19; Drug repurposing; Pharmacophore modeling

Funding

  1. Bio AMP
  2. Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [NRF-2018M3A9A7057263]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used computational methods to screen DrugBank compounds and identified six potential drugs with anti-COVID-19 effects, suggesting that they may be potent inhibitors for COVID-19 therapeutics.
The recent outbreak, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a devastating effect globally with no effective treatment. A swift strategy to find effective therapeutics against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is to repurpose the approved drugs with a blend of computational techniques. In this pursuit an exhaustive computational methods were applied on DrugBank compounds targeting SARS-CoV-2 main protease (M-pro). A structure-based pharmacophore model was generated considering the interactions between the target and the inhibitor N3. The validated model was subjected to screen DrugBank database yielding 35 compounds. Further, evaluating the binding affinity studies with reference drug Remdesivir has resulted six candidates with higher molecular dock scores than the reference compound. These compounds have demonstrated firm molecular dynamics simulation (MDS) results forming stable protein-drug complex demonstrating pharmacophore features. Taken together, our findings propose Viomycin, Enviomycin, Framycetin, Amikacin, Iopromide, and Paromomycin as potent putative inhibitors for COVID-19 therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available