4.5 Article

A method for shifting of cattle dung based biogas digester for enhanced anaerobic co-digestion of cattle dung with leaf litter of neem

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 833-840

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-01166-2

Keywords

Leaf litter of neem; Acclimatization; Anaerobic digestion; Biogas production; Manometric method; Lignocellulosic biomass

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the integration of neem leaf litter into cattle dung-based biogas plants. The introduction of neem leaf litter increased daily biogas production, specific methane yield, and electrical energy production while reducing CO2 emissions. However, the energy required for pulverizing the neem leaf litter decreased the net increase in electrical energy. The study highlights the potential benefits of incorporating neem leaf litter into biogas production systems.
In India, many biogas plants process cattle dung (CD). At the same time, an excessive amount of litter of leaves is swept and burnt. The paper investigates small-scale integration of leaf litter of neem (LLN) to the operational CD-based biogas plant under mesophilic conditions. The introduction of LLN at the volatile solid ratio of 1:4 (LLN:CD) respectively increased daily biogas production, specific methane yield, and the resultant electrical energy by 13.11, 15.26, and 15.02% and reduced the proportion of CO2 by 5.85%. However, because of the energy required to pulverize the LLN in CD-LLN-based, the net percentage increase of the electrical energy dropped to 13.59%. CD-LLN-based reactor also produced 56.34% higher electrical energy per organic substrate added and performed well by 15.0% in terms of CO2 emission compared to CD-based. Digester performance was seriously unaffected during the transition stage. The study highlights another way of managing LLN and shifting anaerobic reactors from one feedstock to another.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available