4.5 Article

Effect of nanoparticles on the droplet combustion of rice bran oil biodiesel

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 1375-1393

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-01209-8

Keywords

Droplet combustion; Biodiesel; Rice bran oil; Magnelium; Nanoparticles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focused on combustion of rice bran oil (RBO) methyl ester blends with diesel, using nanoparticles of magnelium. Results indicated that the B20 blend with 25 ppm nanoparticles has potential as fuel, and could be more economical with an injection droplet diameter of 0.77 mm. Additionally, other blends like B20 with 75 ppm show promise as fuel options.
The present study is dealt with the phenomenon of combustion for rice bran oil (RBO) methyl ester blends with diesel along with nanoparticles of magnelium. Nanoparticles composition of 25 ppm, 50 ppm, and 75 ppm are added to blends of B20, B40, and B60 in the study. A conversion rate of 89.64 +/- 2.8% is observed during the transesterification reaction performed at 5 wt% of potassium hydroxide (KOH) catalyst, 10:1 alcohol to oil ratio (methanol), 75 degrees C reaction temperature, and 60 min reaction time. During the combustion study, few samples displayed the puffing characteristics, which are caused by popping of bubbles at lower pressure. The summary of the present study suggested that blend B20 with 25 ppm nanoparticles has the potential to be used as fuel and further proposed that the fuel will be more economical if the injection droplet diameter is 0.77 mm. Other blends like B20 with 75 ppm are also likely to be used as fuel due to its exhibition of lesser threat towards combustion. Bubble formation followed by micro-explosion is observed in B60 with 25 ppm blend. The present study hoped to enrich future researchers working in similar area for signifying the importance of understanding droplet combustion of biofuels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available