4.5 Article

Flow in a Paper-based Bioactive Channel - Study on Electrochemical Detection of Glucose and Uric Acid

Journal

ELECTROANALYSIS
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 2245-2252

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201600210

Keywords

Lab-on-paper; Paper-based analytical device; enzyme immobilization; biosensor; computer modeling

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  2. National Institute of Science and Technology in Bioanalytics (INCTBio)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although paper-based analysis is known for centuries, only during the last decade this simple substrate became an object of detailed microfluidic studies. In order to obtain optimum performance and separation of the analytes in a microfluidic channel, devices should be optimized, both in terms of architecture and paper properties. Enzyme immobilization methods can not only increase the storage stability but also have an impact on the flow in paper matrix, providing additional charges, and changing the porous structure of paper. Therefore it should be guaranteed that the method of choice will not obstruct the flux in the final device. Paper-based device proposed in this study was composed of a bioactive channel, Pt working electrode, pencil drawn pseudo-reference electrode, a buffer filled sponge providing the wicking solution and a stack of wicking pads to guarantee continuous flow. Based on our previous research we chose 4 methods of enzyme immobilization relying on different phenomena (adsorption, covalent linkage, layer-by-layer, capsules). Different channel architectures were also evaluated in order to achieve optimum time of the enzymatic reaction, separation of peaks and the time of measurement. Experimental results were compared with computer simulations. Final device could quantify glucose (2.0-10.0 mmol L-1) and uric acid (0.1-1.2 mmol L-1) in their clinical range with good repeatability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available