4.7 Article

Development of Pea Breeding Lines with Resistance to Orobanche crenata Derived from Pea Landraces and Wild Pisum spp.

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11010036

Keywords

pea; broomrape; parasitic weeds; resistance; breeding

Funding

  1. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) [AGL2017-82019, RYC-2015-18961]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research successfully developed advanced pea breeding lines with resistance to broomrape through wide crosses with resistant parents, and confirmed their resistance and agronomic performance through field trials and rhizotron experiments, showing promising yield potential in environments with high broomrape incidence.
Pea (Pisum sativum) is an important grain legume worldwide whose cultivation is severely constrained by the root parasitic weed crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata), which is widespread in the Mediterranean Basin and Middle East. No resistance is available in commercialized cultivars but some levels of incomplete resistance has been reported in pea landraces and Pisum spp. relatives. In this paper we report the development of a number of advanced pea breeding lines with resistance derived from wide crosses with resistant P. fulvum, P. sativum ssp. elatius, P. sativum ssp. syriacum, and with pea landraces, and critically discuss current progress and future perspectives on pea breeding for broomrape resistance. Resistance of breeding lines was confirmed over five field trials, showing markedly reduced broomrape over ground emergence, and in rhizotron experiments, showing either reduced tubercle formation or, in some of the lines, also hampered tubercle development that might grow slower or even become necrotic and die. Breeding lines performed well agronomically, having similar or mostly higher yields than the parental pea cv. Messire in environments with high broomrape incidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available