4.4 Review

NOTCH1: Review of its role in lymphatic development and study of seven families with rare pathogenic variants

Journal

MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1529

Keywords

genetic diagnosis; lymphedema; Next Generation Sequencing (NGS); NOTCH1

Funding

  1. Provincia Autonoma di Trento within the initiative LP 6/99 [dgp 1045/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers developed a Next-Generation-Sequencing protocol to screen genetic variants related to lymphedema in 246 Italian patients. Seven out of 235 patients were found to carry rare missense variants in the NOTCH1 gene, suggesting its potential role as a novel candidate for genetic predisposition to lymphedema. The study highlights the importance of genetic analysis in understanding the causes of lymphedema.
Background: We developed a Next-Generation-Sequencing (NGS) protocol to screen the most frequent genetic variants related to lymphedema and a group of candidate genes. The aim of the study was to find the genetic cause of lymphedema in the analyzed patients. Methods: We sequenced a cohort of 246 Italian patients with lymphatic malformations. In the first step, we analyzed genes known to be linked to lymphedema: 235 out of 246 patients tested negative for the most frequent variants and underwent testing for variants in a group of candidate genes, including the NOTCH1 gene, selected from the database of mouse models. We also performed in silico analysis to observe molecular interactions between the wild-type and the variant amino acids and other protein residues. Results: Seven out of 235 probands, five with sporadic and two with familial lymphedema, were found to carry rare missense variants in the NOTCH1 gene. Conclusions: Our results propose that NOTCH1 could be a novel candidate for genetic predisposition to lymphedema.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available