4.6 Review

Advanced 3D Cell Culture Techniques in Micro-Bioreactors, Part II: Systems and Applications

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9010021

Keywords

micro-bioreactor; 3D cell culture; (hydro)gels; multicellular aggregates; co-culture; scaffold; flow; simulations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides a detailed description of the research status of 3D cell culture in micro-bioreactors, highlighting different types of micro-bioreactors and their applications. It is noteworthy that micro-bioreactors have been utilized in SARS-CoV research prior to the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, and the complexity levels in the systems were defined based on the corresponding 3D cell culture techniques applied.
In this second part of our systematic review on the research area of 3D cell culture in micro-bioreactors we give a detailed description of the published work with regard to the existing micro-bioreactor types and their applications, and highlight important results gathered with the respective systems. As an interesting detail, we found that micro-bioreactors have already been used in SARS-CoV research prior to the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. As our literature research revealed a variety of 3D cell culture configurations in the examined bioreactor systems, we defined in review part one complexity levels by means of the corresponding 3D cell culture techniques applied in the systems. The definition of the complexity is thereby based on the knowledge that the spatial distribution of cell-extracellular matrix interactions and the spatial distribution of homologous and heterologous cell-cell contacts play an important role in modulating cell functions. Because at least one of these parameters can be assigned to the 3D cell culture techniques discussed in the present review, we structured the studies according to the complexity levels applied in the MBR systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available