4.7 Article

Bacterial Cellulose Containing Combinations of Antimicrobial Peptides with Various QQ Enzymes as a Prototype of an Enhanced Antibacterial Dressing: In Silico and In Vitro Data

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12121155

Keywords

bacterial cellulose; combination; antimicrobial peptide; quorum-quenching enzymes; molecular docking; enhanced antibacterial activity; surface morphology; dressing prototype

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-14-00061]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic research [18-29-17069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve the action of already in use antibiotics or new antimicrobial agents against different bacteria, the development of effective combinations of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) with enzymes that can quench the quorum (QQ) sensing of bacterial cells was undertaken. Enzymes hydrolyzing N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs) and peptides that are signal molecules of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial cells, respectively, were estimated as partners for antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides in newly designed antimicrobial-enzymatic combinations. The molecular docking of six antimicrobial agents to the surface of 10 different QQ enzyme molecules was simulated in silico. This made it possible to choose the best variants among the target combinations. Further, bacterial cellulose (BC) was applied as a carrier for uploading such combinations to generally compose prototypes of effective dressing materials with morphology, providing good absorbance. The in vitro analysis of antibacterial activity of prepared BC samples confirmed the significantly enhanced efficiency of the action of AMPs (including polymyxin B and colistin, which are antibiotics of last resort) in combination with AHL-hydrolyzing enzymes (penicillin acylase and His(6)-tagged organophosphorus hydrolase) against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available