4.6 Review

Feasibility of Immunohistochemical p16 Staining in the Diagnosis of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.524928

Keywords

human papillomavirus; squamous cell cancers of the head and neck; immunohistochemical staining; p16; meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81570344]
  2. Norman Bethune Program of Jilin University [2015225, 2015203]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0112100]
  4. Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Foundations [20180414039GH, 20190201200JC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of IHC- p16INK4a (p16) as an alternative modality for diagnosing HPV infection. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of IHC-p16 staining. A total of 30 studies involving 2,963 patients were included from 2007 to 2019. The combined sensitivity was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89-0.91); positive likelihood ratio (LR), 6.80 (95% CI: 5.63-8.21); negative LR, 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07-0.16); diagnostic odds ratio, 85.98 (95% CI: 55.57-133.03); and area under the curve value, 0.9550. Subgroup analysis showed that the IHC-p16 test was more consistent with the in situ hybridization (ISH) test and has greater diagnostic value for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The diagnostic efficacy of IHC-p16 varied among countries. In conclusion, IHC-p16 has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HPV infection in HNSCC. The consistency of IHC-p16 findings with those of ISH indicate that their combination can be used to improve the specificity of diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available