4.7 Article

Calcium channel blocker amlodipine besylate therapy is associated with reduced case fatality rate of COVID-19 patients with hypertension

Journal

CELL DISCOVERY
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41421-020-00235-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2018ZX10101004001005]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31970165, 81825019, 81722041, 31770188]
  3. Open Research Fund Program of Wuhan National Bio-Safety Level 4 Lab of CAS [2018ACCP-MS01, 2020ACCP-MS02]
  4. Hubei Science and Technology Project [2020FCA003]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2018367]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has now spread to >200 countries posing a global public health concern. Patients with comorbidity, such as hypertension suffer more severe infection with elevated mortality. The development of effective antiviral drugs is in urgent need to treat COVID-19 patients. Here, we report that calcium channel blockers (CCBs), a type of antihypertensive drug that is widely used in clinics, inhibited the post-entry replication events of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, while no in vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect was observed for the two other major types of antihypertensive drugs, namely, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. CCB combined with chloroquine showed a significantly enhanced anti-SARS-CoV-2 efficacy. A retrospective clinical investigation on hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hypertension as the only comorbidity revealed that the CCB amlodipine besylate therapy was associated with a decreased case fatality rate. The results from this study suggest that CCB administration to COVID-19 patients with hypertension as the comorbidity might improve the disease outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available