4.6 Review

Nurse-Like Cells and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia B Cells: A Mutualistic Crosstalk inside Tissue Microenvironments

Journal

CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10020217

Keywords

CLL; microenvironment; nurse-like cells

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [IG21436]
  2. Fondazione Umberto Veronesi, Italy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia in Western countries, involving cooperation between genetic defects and tumor microenvironmental interactions in pathogenesis. CLL is considered addicted to the host, with crosstalk between leukemic cells and the tumor microenvironment essential for supporting CLL cell survival and proliferation.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia in Western countries and is an example of hematological disease where cooperation between genetic defects and tumor microenvironmental interaction is involved in pathogenesis. CLL is a disease that is considered as addicted to the host; indeed, the crosstalk between leukemic cells and the tumor microenvironment is essential for leukemic clone maintenance supporting CLL cells' survival, proliferation, and protection from drug-induced apoptosis. CLL cells are not innocent bystanders but actively model and manipulate the surrounding microenvironment to their own advantage. Besides the different players involved in this crosstalk, nurse-like cells (NLC) resemble features related to leukemia-associated macrophages with an important function in preserving CLL cell survival and supporting an immunosuppressive microenvironment. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the role played by NLC in creating a nurturing and permissive milieu for CLL cells, illustrating the therapeutic possibilities in order to specifically target and re-educate them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available