4.7 Article

Transient Increase and Delay of Multifocal Electroretinograms Following Laser Photocoagulations for Diabetic Macular Edema

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020357

Keywords

diabetic macular edema; diabetic retinopathy; electroretinogram (ERG); multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG); photocoagulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study observed changes in mfERGs before and after retinal photocoagulation, finding that the amplitude in the irradiated area transiently increased post-treatment and then significantly decreased, indicating dynamic alterations in retinal function following the procedure.
Background: The acute physiological changes induced by focal retinal photocoagulation (PC) have been largely unexplored. Methods: This was a case-series study. We recorded multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs) just before PC, and mfERGs were also recorded 5 ', 15 ', one hour, 24 h, and one week after the PCs. Transient changes of mfERGs were analyzed in eyes which underwent PCs to treat diabetic macular edema. The mfERGs recorded from the predominantly irradiated area and that from non-irradiated areas were analyzed separately. Results: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included in this study. The mfERGs elicited from non-irradiated areas did not change after PC, but the mfERGs elicited from the irradiated area changed with time; the amplitude was larger at 60 ' than that before (p < 0.05) and at 5 ' after PC (p < 0.01) and significantly smaller at 24 h and 1 week than that before and at 60 ' after the PC (p < 0.01). The implicit time was significantly prolonged after PC. mfERG on irradiated area with the severe diabetic change was less altered after PCs. Conclusions: The transient increase in the amplitude at 60 ' likely resulted from a biological amplification of partially damaged cells adjacent to the PC spots. The mfERGs manifested the dynamic alterations of the retinal function following PCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available