4.8 Article

Making climate projections conditional on historical observations

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abc0671

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Meteo-France
  2. CNRS
  3. European Union [776613, 820829]
  4. EUPHEME project (ERA4CS, an ERA-NET - JPI Climate)
  5. EUPHEME project (European Union) [690462]
  6. French Ministere de la Transition Ecologique et Solidaire, under the Convention pour les Services Climatiques
  7. Environment and Climate Change Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies have attempted to constrain climate projections based on recent observations, with limited impact until recently. By using a new climate model ensemble, improved observations, and a new statistical method, uncertainty in estimates of past and future human-induced warming has been reduced. Historical observations have narrowed uncertainty on projected future warming by approximately 50%, and previous lower estimates of 21st century warming can now be excluded.
Many studies have sought to constrain climate projections based on recent observations. Until recently, these constraints had limited impact, and projected warming ranges were driven primarily by model outputs. Here, we use the newest climate model ensemble, improved observations, and a new statistical method to narrow uncertainty on estimates of past and future human-induced warming. Cross-validation suggests that our method produces robust results and is not overconfident. We derive consistent observationally constrained estimates of attributable warming to date and warming rate, the response to a range of future scenarios, and metrics of climate sensitivity. We find that historical observations narrow uncertainty on projected future warming by about 50%. Our results suggest that using an unconstrained multimodel ensemble is no longer the best choice for global mean temperature projections and that the lower end of previous estimates of 21st century warming can now be excluded.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available