4.6 Article

Predicting Charge Transfer Stability between Sulfide Solid Electrolytes and Li Metal Anodes

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 150-157

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02372

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR), an Energy Innovation Hub - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Basic Energy Sciences
  2. institutional program of the Korea Institute of Science and Technology [2E30202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research investigates the reduction or oxidation of solid electrolytes by battery electrodes, finding that most solid electrolytes are susceptible to electron injection, except for Li3BS3 which shows resistance to reduction. Comparing charge transfer stability with chemical stability allows for a comprehensive assessment of interfacial stability. This approach is demonstrated through experiments on the Li/Li2H2PO4/LGPS interface system.
Reduction or oxidation of a solid electrolyte (SE) by the electrodes of a battery can inject electrons or holes into the SE, inducing unwanted electrical conductivity and/or precipitating harmful interfacial reactions. Here, the likelihood for charge injection from a Li metal anode to 10 sulfide-based SEs is determined by computing the positions of the SE's band edges with respect to the electrochemical potential of the electrode. Although these SEs exhibit large band gaps (>4 eV), nearly all are susceptible to electron injection. One notable exception is the Bcontaining sulfide Li3BS3, which exhibits the greatest resistance to reduction. The trends in charge transfer stability are compared to those for chemical stability with a Li anode and are found to be similar. The combined characterization of chemical and charge transfer phenomena allows for a comprehensive assessment of interfacial stability. The utility of this approach is demonstrated by interpreting recent experiments on the Li/Li2H2PO4/LGPS interface system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available