4.6 Review

Redox Flow Battery Membranes: Improving Battery Performance by Leveraging Structure-Property Relationships

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 158-176

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02205

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chemours
  2. Thomas & Kipp Gutshall Professorship
  3. U.S. Army Research Office [00090339]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Membranes play a critical role in redox flow batteries (RFBs) by keeping redox-active species in the two half cells separate and allowing the passage of charge-balancing ions. While significant advancements have been made in RFB membranes, further developments are needed to consider conductivity, selectivity, stability, sustainability, and cost.
Membranes are a critical component of redox flow batteries (RFBs), and their major purpose is to keep the redox-active species in the two half cells separate and allow the passage of charge-balancing ions. Despite significant performance enhancements in RFB membranes, further developments are still needed that holistically consider conductivity, selectivity, stability, sustainability, and cost. In this Focus Review, structure-property relationships that have led to advances in membranes for various RFB types (vanadium, zinc, iron, etc.) are analyzed. First, two strategies to increase conductivity are highlighted: tuning membrane microstructure and controlling electrolyte uptake. Next, selectivity improvements through size and/or Donnan exclusion are reviewed. With respect to stability, methods to enhance the mechanical robustness of membranes and factors that affect chemical stability are discussed. Additionally, avenues to reduce battery cost and increase sustainability are explored. Future directions are suggested, which include how more in-depth theoretical studies, microstructure optimization, and enhanced characterization will push the field of RFB membranes forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available