4.2 Article

The utilization of waste cooking palm oil as a green carbon source for the growth of multilayer graphene

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 347-358

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s41779-020-00539-0

Keywords

Palm oil; Graphene; Nickel; Multilayer; Carbon

Funding

  1. Research Management Centre (RMC), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)
  2. Ministry of Higher Education Ministry (MoHE), Malaysia
  3. [600-IRMI/FRGSRACER 5/3 (102/2019)]
  4. [600-RMIS/1/RAGS 5/3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The waste cooking palm oil was utilized as a green carbon source for synthesizing graphene through double thermal chemical vapor deposition. The graphene synthesized at 1000 degrees C showed the highest quality with good crystallinity and hexagonal graphite structure. The presence of the graphene layer on Ni was confirmed by the highest reflectance in the visible light region shown in the UV-Vis result.
Waste cooking palm oil (WCPO) has been utilized as a green carbon source for the synthesization of graphene by double thermal chemical vapor deposition. The WCPO was placed in the first furnace (precursor furnace) whereas nickel was placed in the second furnace (deposition furnace). The deposition temperatures were varied between 850 and 1100 degrees C. Raman results reveal the highest 2-D peak for the sample synthesized at 1000 degrees C, which indicates the high-quality formation of graphene. Besides, the sample also shows good crystallinity with a sharp peak at 26.8 degrees which represents the hexagonal graphite structure and the introduction of graphene sheet formation. On the other hand, the FESEM image displays hexagonal structures since the graphene layers were formed after the precipitation of the carbon. Meanwhile, the UV-Vis result shows the highest reflectance in the visible light region which indicates the presence of the graphene layer on Ni.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available