4.1 Review

Applications and challenges in therapeutic drug monitoring of cancer treatment: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 693-701

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1078155220979048

Keywords

Pharmacokinetics; therapeutic drug monitoring; anti-cancer agents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most anticancer agents exhibit wide variability in pharmacokinetics and have a narrow therapeutic index, making fixed dosing suboptimal. While using pharmacokinetic or therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing may achieve best therapeutic outcomes, challenges arise from multiple factors contributing to pharmacokinetic variability. Standard guidelines for pharmacokinetic-guided dosing are lacking for most agents, emphasizing the importance of understanding factors contributing to pharmacokinetic variability for dose individualization.
Most anticancer agents show wide variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and have a narrow therapeutic index which makes fixed dosing suboptimal. To achieve the best therapeutic outcomes with these agents, many studies have postulated using PK or therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing. However, multiple factors contribute to the variability in PKs making the application of TDM in practice challenging. Also, despite the known association with clinical outcomes, standard guidelines on PK-guided dosing are lacking for most agents. Understanding the factors that contribute to PK variability and their impact is essential for dose individualization. The purpose of this review is to discuss the factors that contribute to the PK variability of anticancer agents and the challenges faced in practice when individualizing doses for certain widely used agents. Searching the literature has identified several gaps and efforts are needed to ensure better targeting of cancer therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available