Journal
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 211-219Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0004563220985547
Keywords
Colorectal cancer; colorectal disease; faecal biomarkers; faecal immunochemical test; faecal haemoglobin; primary care
Categories
Funding
- Detect Cancer Early initiative (Scottish Government)
- Chief Scientist Office
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examined the clinical outcomes of using f-Hb for CRC risk assessment in primary care, showing that decisions on reassurance or further investigation could be made based on different f-Hb thresholds. However, for patients with iron deficiency anemia, severe symptoms, or persistent symptoms, further investigation should not be denied.
Background Faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb), estimated using a faecal immunochemical test, can be safely implemented in primary care to assess risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Clinical outcomes of patients presenting with symptoms of lower gastrointestinal disease were examined using an extensive range of f-Hb thresholds to decide on reassurance or referral for further investigation. Methods All patients who attended primary care and submitted a single faecal specimen faecal immunochemical test in the first year of the routine service had f-Hb estimated using HM-JACKarc: f-Hb thresholds from <2 to >= 400 mu g Hb/g faeces (mu g/g) were examined. Results Low f-Hb thresholds of <2, <7, <10 and <20 mu g/g gave respective CRC risks of 0.1, 0.3, 0.3 and 0.4%, numbers needed to scope for one CRC of 871, 335, 300 and 249, and 'false negative' rates of 2.9, 11.4, 13.3 and 17.1%. With thresholds of <2, <7, <10 and <20 mu g/g, 48.6, 74.6, 78.1 and 83.2% respectively of symptomatic patients could be managed without further investigation. With reassurance thresholds of <2 mu g/g, <7 mu g/g and <10 mu g/g, the thresholds for referral for urgent investigation would be >400 mu g/g, >= 200 mu g/g and >= 100 mu g/g. However, patients with a f-Hb concentration of <10 or <20 mu g/g with iron deficiency anaemia, or with severe or persistent symptoms, should not be denied further investigation. Conclusions In primary care, f-Hb, in conjunction with clinical assessment, can safely and objectively determine individual risk of CRC and decide on simple reassurance or urgent, or routine referral.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available