4.7 Article

Production of low-cost adsorbent with small particle size from calcium carbonate rich residue carbonatation cake and their high performance phosphate adsorption applications

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.054

Keywords

Phosphorus removal; Adsorption; Residue carbonatisation cake; Calcine carbonatisation cake

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the removal of phosphorus from aqueous solutions using carbonatisation cake. The maximum phosphate adsorption capacity was found to be 65.16 mg g(-1). Calcines produced by heating the carbonated cake to 600 degrees C were also effective in removing phosphate from wastewaters.
This study investigated phosphorus removal from aqueous solutions using carbonatisation cake, which is a sugar residue containing a significant amount of reactive calcium carbonate. The chemical composition of the carbonatisation cake was determined, and the organic contamination of the carbonatisation cake and calcine in contact with water was determined. In addition, TGA, DTA, XRD, SEM-EDX, BET, FTIR, density, pHzpc and particle size distribution were analyzed for carbonatisation cake, product and post-phosphate removal calcined product. Batch experiments were performed to determine the effect of dose, phosphorus concentration, temperature and contact time on phosphorus removal from aqueous medium. Maximum phosphate adsorption capacity was found to be 65.16 mg g(-1) at 25 degrees C, pH of 6 and adsorbent dosage of 1 g L-1 for a contact time of 180 min. Adsorption experiments were applied to adsorption isotherms. Kinetic, thermodynamic and mass transfer calculations were calculated. The results show that calcines produced by heating the carbonated cake to 600 degrees C, which is not cost-effective in sugar production, can be used effectively to remove phosphate from wastewaters. (C) 2021 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available