4.6 Article

Personal Recovery and Its Determinants Among People Living With Schizophrenia in China

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.602524

Keywords

recovery; schizophrenia; predictors; disability; functioning; China

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71804197]
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The past few decades have seen an evolution in the understanding of recovery from a clinical-based view that focuses on symptoms and functioning to a more consumer-oriented perspective that focuses on personal recovery. The present study aimed to assess personal recovery among people living with schizophrenia and determine its predictors. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited a random sample of 400 people living with schizophrenia (PLS) from twelve community health centers of Hunan, China. Recovery was assessed using the short-form 8-item Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-8). PLS disability and functioning were assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), respectively. Results: Participants had a mean personal recovery score of 20.29 (SD: 9.31, Range: 8-40). Personal recovery was predicted by both socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Older age (r = -0.17, p < 0.001), being female (r = -2.29, p = 0.019), and higher disability (r = -0.22, p < 0.001) were independently associated with worse personal recovery, while having a college education (r = 5.49, p = 0.002), and higher functioning (r = 0.09, p = 0.017) were independently associated with better personal recovery. Conclusion: Interventions to improve recovery among PLS may be best served by reducing the impact of disability and improving functioning, with targeted interventions for individuals who are older, female and less educated in order to increase their likelihood of recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available