4.7 Article

Benchmarking Computational Doublet-Detection Methods for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Journal

CELL SYSTEMS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 176-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.11.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/NIGMS [R01GM120507]
  2. Sloan Research Fellowship
  3. Johnson & Johnson WiSTEM2D Award
  4. NSF [DBI-1846216]
  5. UCLADGSOMW.M. Keck Foundation Junior Faculty Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic benchmark study of nine cutting-edge computational doublet-detection methods in single-cell RNA sequencing, comparing detection accuracy and computational efficiency. Results showed diverse performance among methods, with Doublet-Finder exhibiting the best detection accuracy and cxds having the highest computational efficiency.
In single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), doublets form when two cells are encapsulated into one reaction volume. The existence of doublets, which appear to be-but are not-real cells, is a key confounder in scRNA-seq data analysis. Computational methods have been developed to detect doublets in scRNA-seq data; however, the scRNA-seq field lacks a comprehensive benchmarking of these methods, making it difficult for researchers to choose an appropriate method for specific analyses. We conducted a systematic benchmark study of nine cutting-edge computational doublet-detection methods. Our study included 16 real datasets, which contained experimentally annotated doublets, and 112 realistic synthetic datasets. We compared doublet-detection methods regarding detection accuracy under various experimental settings, impacts on downstream analyses, and computational efficiencies. Our results show that existing methods exhibited diverse performance and distinct advantages in different aspects. Overall, the Doublet-Finder method has the best detection accuracy, and the cxds method has the highest computational efficiency. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the Supplemental Information.Y

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available